Organic Chemistry

Lindlar Catalyst: A Poison That Makes It Stop

Lindlar Catalyst is palladium that has been deliberately crippled — precipitated onto chalk, dosed with lead, and dulled further with a splash of quinoline — so that it can only do half a job. Give it an alkyne and one atmosphere of hydrogen and it adds exactly two hydrogen atoms, both to the same face, and then stops: you get the cis (Z) alkene, typically better than 95% pure, instead of the alkane. Nothing thermodynamic holds it there — the second hydrogenation is still worth another −137 kJ/mol — so the trick is entirely kinetic. It is the standard way chemists build the cis double bonds in vitamin A, insect pheromones, and half the polyene natural products ever made.

  • Catalyst~5 wt% Pd on CaCO3, poisoned with lead(II) acetate (~3.5 wt% Pb), plus ~5 mol% quinoline
  • Conditions1 atm H2, 20–25 °C, complete in ~1–4 h
  • Stop pointExactly 1.00 equivalent of H2 = 24.5 L per mole at 25 °C, 1 atm
  • EnthalpyAlkyne to alkene −175 kJ/mol; alkene to alkane a further −137 kJ/mol
  • SelectivityZ-selectivity typically >95%, commonly 97:3 Z:E
  • Why it worksAlkyne binds Pd roughly 10–100× more strongly than the alkene it makes

Interactive visualization

Press play, or step through manually. The visualization is yours to drive — try it before reading on.

Open visualization fullscreen ↗

Watch the 60-second explainer

A condensed visual walkthrough — narrated, captioned, under a minute.

A catalyst built to be bad at its job

Palladium is the finest hydrogenation metal there is, and that is precisely the problem: give ordinary 10% Pd/C an alkyne and hydrogen and you get the alkane. Lindlar's catalyst is that metal, systematically ruined.

The recipe, published by Herbert Lindlar (1909–2009) at Hoffmann-La Roche in Basel (Helv. Chim. Acta 1952, 35, 446), carries three deliberate handicaps. The palladium is precipitated as roughly 5 wt% Pd onto calcium carbonate rather than carbon — chalk is a low-area, mildly basic support, so it disperses the metal poorly, offers the desorbed alkene almost no pore network to linger in, and keeps acid-catalysed side reactions off the table. The fresh catalyst is treated with lead(II) acetate, leaving about 3.5 wt% Pb alloyed into the surface. Finally, about 5 mol% quinoline on substrate goes in as a second moderator, usually added by the chemist rather than the supplier.

Lead and quinoline do related jobs. Lead dilutes the contiguous Pd ensembles, breaking up the multi-atom sites that grip an alkene tightly enough to hydrogenate it, blunting the step edges and kinks that are a particle's most aggressive sites, and making it far harder for hydrogen to dissolve into the lattice as bulk β-PdHx. Quinoline's nitrogen lone pair then coordinates to whatever aggressive palladium is left. The result still splits H2 and still binds an alkyne, but has lost its appetite for an alkene.

The Horiuti–Polanyi mechanism, step by step

Everything happens on the metal surface, by the sequence Horiuti and Polanyi proposed in 1934 (Trans. Faraday Soc. 30, 1164), still the working model ninety years on.

  • 1. Hydrogen chemisorbs dissociatively. H2 strikes the palladium and comes apart into two surface hydride atoms — essentially barrierless on a clean Pd(111) terrace, which is why 1 atm and room temperature suffice.
  • 2. The alkyne lies down. It adsorbs side-on across two or more Pd atoms, C–C axis parallel to the terrace, in a di-σ/π mode using both orthogonal π systems — a far stronger grip than an alkene manages with one.
  • 3. The first hydride inserts. One surface H migrates onto a carbon, giving a σ-bonded vinyl — the half-hydrogenated state — still anchored through the other carbon.
  • 4. The second hydride follows, from the same side. It arrives from the same metal face, because that is the only place hydrogen exists. Both hydrogens therefore land on one face of the former triple bond: the addition is syn, and the substituents are forced onto the same side. That is the Z alkene, and no other geometry is available from a single surface encounter.
  • 5. The alkene lets go. With one π bond and two substituents in the way it binds far more weakly than the alkyne did, and desorbs before a third hydrogen finds it.

Step 4 is not an assumption. Run the reaction with D2 and the dominant product is the cis-1,2-dideuterio alkene, both deuteriums on one face — the classic proof of suprafacial delivery. On hotter, unmoderated palladium you also see scrambled and monodeuterated products, itself evidence that step 3 is reversible.

Thermodynamics cannot stop this — kinetics can

There is no thermodynamic ledge for the alkene to sit on. For the parent system, hydrogenating acetylene to ethylene has ΔH = −175 kJ/mol, and hydrogenating ethylene onward to ethane a further −137 kJ/mol — the second step is worth another three quarters of the first. Internal alkynes behave the same way (2-butyne to cis-2-butene, about −153 kJ/mol, then ≈ −119 kJ/mol to butane).

Worse, the isomer you want is the wrong one. cis-2-Butene is 4.2 kJ/mol LESS stable than trans-2-butene, because the two methyls on the same side push against each other. Lindlar hydrogenation deliberately delivers the uphill isomer, so its selectivity is entirely kinetic: the product is whatever the surface makes fastest.

The kinetic lever is competitive adsorption. The alkyne binds palladium roughly 10–100× more strongly than the alkene it produces, so while any alkyne remains it monopolises the surface. Take Langmuir-style competition with K(alkyne)/K(alkene) = 50: at 99% conversion the alkyne is 1% of the organic material in solution, yet the ratio of occupied sites is still 50 × (1/99) ≈ 0.51 — it holds a third of the covered surface while nearly gone from the flask. When the last alkyne goes that protection vanishes and the alkane forms quickly — hence the sharp break in the H2 uptake curve, and the instruction to stop at exactly 1.00 equivalent of H2.

The poisons buy the rest. Teschner and co-workers (Science, 2008, 320, 86) showed by in-situ X-ray spectroscopy that selectivity is settled just below the surface, by two subsurface species pulling opposite ways. Hydrogen dissolved in the lattice as bulk β-PdHx is the culprit: it feeds an indiscriminate hydrogen flux up to the surface that over-reduces and isomerises. Carbon dissolved into the near-surface lattice is the cure, filling the interstitial sites hydrogen would otherwise occupy; a palladium particle only becomes selective once that carbon is in place.

Running it: hardware, stoichiometry and a worked hydrogen budget

The apparatus is deliberately unimpressive: a flask, a stir bar, a hydrogen balloon or low-pressure Parr shaker, and a gas burette if you are serious. Conditions are 1 atm H2 at 20–25 °C, catalyst at 5–10 wt% on substrate, in hexane, ethyl acetate or toluene, quinoline added before the hydrogen, complete in 1–4 h.

The number that matters is the gas: one mole of H2 at 25 °C and 1 atm occupies 24.5 L (V = RT/P = 0.08206 × 298.15 / 1 = 24.47 L). So for a real run:

  • Substrate: 5.00 mmol of an internal alkyne.
  • 1.00 equivalent of H2 = 5.00 × 10⁻³ mol × 24.47 L/mol = 122 mL of hydrogen at 25 °C, 1 atm.
  • Stop the instant the burette reads 122 mL. Let it run to 147 mL (1.20 equiv) and you have, to first order, turned 20% of your hard-won Z-alkene into alkane — essentially inseparable from the alkene on silica.

Without a burette, monitor by TLC or GC and quench at the first disappearance of alkyne; never stir on under H2 just to be sure. Filtration is then where people set fire to things. A palladium filter cake loaded with adsorbed hydrogen and wet with volatile solvent is pyrophoric and ignites that solvent as it dries in air. Keep it wet, quench under water, and dispose of it as lead-bearing waste — lead(II) acetate is a reproductive toxin and a REACH substance of very high concern, which is why lead-free substitutes (Pd–Ag, Pd–Bi, Pd–Cu single-atom alloys) are an active target.

How you prove you actually got the Z isomer

A geometry claim needs evidence, and three measurements do almost all the work.

  • Proton NMR vinyl coupling. The three-bond H–H coupling across a double bond depends on the dihedral angle: for a 1,2-disubstituted alkene, cis gives 3J ≈ 10–12 Hz and trans gives 3J ≈ 15–16 Hz. The gap is large, unambiguous, and the first thing anyone checks.
  • Infrared. The =C–H out-of-plane bend is diagnostic: a strong band near 675–730 cm⁻¹ for a cis-disubstituted alkene against roughly 965 cm⁻¹ for trans. The AOCS trans-fat method (Cd 14d-99) rests on that band.
  • Capillary GC. On the long, highly polar cyanopropyl-polysiloxane columns AOCS Ce 1h-05 specifies for cis/trans fatty-acid analysis, the E isomer elutes ahead of the Z and a 97:3 ratio integrates directly. Silver-ion (argentation) TLC or HPLC separates them more cleanly still, because Ag⁺ complexes the less hindered cis π bond more strongly.

The catalyst is specified too: commercial Lindlar ships against a palladium assay (ICP-OES, nominal 5 wt%) and a lead assay (≈ 3.5 wt%), with metal dispersion measured by CO chemisorption. Batch-to-batch variation in lead level is the commonest reason a published procedure fails to reproduce — an under-leaded lot over-reduces, an over-leaded one does nothing — so careful groups burn a calibration run on a model alkyne first.

Vitamin A, pheromones, and the largest Lindlar-like reactor on Earth

Lindlar was not doing a methods study for its own sake — he worked inside Roche's vitamin A and carotenoid programme in Basel, whose industrial routes ran through acetylenic intermediates that had to be half-hydrogenated to a cis double bond without touching the polyene chain already in the molecule; nothing in 1952 could do it. The reproducible preparation appeared in Organic Syntheses in 1966 (Lindlar and Dubuis, vol. 46, p. 89) and has barely changed since. It is now the default way to install a Z double bond — insect pheromones are overwhelmingly Z-alkenes and their mating-disruption lures are made this way at tonne scale, as are leukotrienes and prostaglandins.

Its largest relative is not in a flask at all. Every steam cracker on Earth makes ethylene contaminated with 0.5–2% acetylene, and polymer-grade ethylene must carry less than about 1 ppm, because acetylene poisons Ziegler–Natta and metallocene polymerisation catalysts and forms shock-sensitive metal acetylides in the cold box. The fix is an acetylene converter: a fixed bed of Pd–Ag on alumina, often only 0.01–0.05 wt% Pd, with carbon monoxide metered into the feed as the moderator in place of lead and quinoline — the same problem at millions of tonnes a year. Lose the exotherm and the bed runs away to ethane; let oligomerisation take hold and it fouls with green oil, the C4-and-heavier tar that forces a shutdown.

Failure modes, and the reactions it gets confused with

Lindlar hydrogenation fails in a small number of well-characterised ways.

  • Overshoot. Past 1.00 equiv of H2 the alkane grows, and it will not chromatograph away.
  • Z to E drift on a long run. A Z-alkene that re-adsorbs can take one hydrogen to give a σ-bonded alkyl, and in that half-hydrogenated alkyl the C–C bond is genuinely single and free to rotate; β-hydride elimination then releases it as the E isomer, or with the double bond walked a carbon along the chain. (The σ-vinyl from the alkyne cannot do this — its C–C bond is still double, so it cannot rotate — though it can eliminate the hydrogen it just received, which is what scrambles deuterium labels.) This is the origin of the 3% in a 97:3 ratio; it worsens with time, temperature, H2 pressure and under-poisoned catalyst, and it is the main thing quinoline suppresses.
  • Hydrogenolysis, or no reaction at all. Palladium can cleave propargylic and benzylic C–O bonds; conversely, thiols, sulfides, phosphines and free amines poison Pd properly rather than partially.
  • Terminal alkynes. They react fast, and the terminal alkene has no geometry to protect, so the stop is far less clean.

And two look-alikes worth keeping straight:

  • Sodium in liquid ammonia at −78 °C is the complementary reaction, not a variant: with no metal surface, a solvated-electron sequence in solution ends at a vinyl anion that settles into the less crowded geometry — the E (trans) alkene, typically >98% E. Terminal alkynes merely deprotonate to the acetylide (pKa ≈ 25).
  • The Rosenmund reduction also uses poisoned palladium — Pd on BaSO4 with quinoline-sulfur or thiourea — but it halts an acyl chloride at the aldehyde, in hot xylene, before the alcohol.
Ways to stop an alkyne at the alkene stage — and the one route that gives the opposite geometry
MethodConditionsProductWhere it breaks
Lindlar catalyst~5 wt% Pd/CaCO3 + Pb(OAc)2, ~5 mol% quinoline, 1 atm H2, 20–25 °CZ (cis) alkene, commonly 97:3 Z:EPast 1.00 equiv H2 the alkane grows; long runs drift to E
Unmodified 5–10% Pd/C1 atm H2, 25 °C, no moderatorAlkane — no stop at allNothing blocks the alkene from re-adsorbing
Na (or Li) in liquid NH3−78 °C, NH3, alcohol proton source, no H2 gasE (trans) alkene, >98% ETerminal alkynes are only deprotonated to the acetylide
P-2 nickel (nickel boride)Ni(OAc)2 + NaBH4, ethylenediamine, 1 atm H2Z (cis) alkene, ~95%Boride activity is batch-sensitive; slower to quench
Zn(Cu/Ag) coupleActivated Zn dust, aqueous methanol, 25–60 °C, no H2 gasZ (cis) alkeneSlow; chosen when Pd would attack other groups
Industrial acetylene converterPd–Ag on alumina, 0.01–0.05 wt% Pd, CO moderator, ~30–120 °CEthylene, residual acetylene below ~1 ppmRunaway exotherm to ethane; fouling by green oil

Frequently asked questions

Why does the Lindlar catalyst stop at the alkene instead of going on to the alkane?

Not for thermodynamic reasons — the second hydrogenation is still worth about −137 kJ/mol and would happily proceed. It stops because the alkyne adsorbs on palladium roughly 10–100× more strongly than the alkene, so it monopolises the surface and keeps the alkene off the metal until it is consumed. The lead and quinoline poisons blunt the most active sites and suppress bulk β-PdHx, which otherwise drives over-reduction. That protection ends the instant the alkyne is gone, which is why you stop at exactly 1.00 equivalent of H2.

Why is the product cis and not trans?

Both hydrogen atoms come from the same palladium face. The alkyne lies flat across the metal, one surface hydride inserts to give a σ-bonded vinyl, and the second hydride arrives from the same face, so the addition is syn and the two substituents are locked onto the same side. Running the reaction with D2 gives the cis-1,2-dideuterio alkene, which is the direct proof. Note that the cis product is actually the less stable isomer — by 4.2 kJ/mol in the 2-butene case — so the selectivity is purely kinetic, not thermodynamic.

What does the quinoline actually do, and can I leave it out?

Quinoline's nitrogen lone pair coordinates to the most reactive palladium sites left over after the lead treatment, and it strongly suppresses the reversible half-hydrogenation that isomerises Z to E. You can leave it out, and some commercial lots behave well without it, but an under-poisoned catalyst then over-reduces or drifts toward the E isomer. Typical loading is about 5 mol% on substrate, though published recipes range from a few drops to roughly one equivalent by weight on catalyst.

How do I know when to stop the reaction?

Measure the hydrogen, not the clock. One equivalent is 24.5 L per mole at 25 °C and 1 atm, so a 5.00 mmol reaction needs exactly 122 mL of H2, and you filter the catalyst off the moment the gas burette reads it. If you cannot measure gas volume, monitor by TLC or GC and quench at the first disappearance of alkyne, because the alkane you make by waiting is almost impossible to separate from the alkene afterwards.

How do I get the trans alkene instead?

Use sodium (or lithium) in liquid ammonia at −78 °C, a completely different mechanism with no metal surface involved. The alkyne picks up a solvated electron to become a radical anion, ammonia protonates it to a vinyl radical, a second electron gives a vinyl anion that relaxes into the less crowded geometry, and a final protonation delivers the E alkene, typically >98% E. Terminal alkynes are simply deprotonated to the acetylide and are not reduced at all.

Is the Rosenmund reduction the same thing as a Lindlar hydrogenation?

No — the two only share the idea of poisoned palladium. Rosenmund uses Pd on barium sulfate moderated with quinoline-sulfur or thiourea, and hydrogenates an acyl chloride to an aldehyde in hot xylene, stopping before the alcohol. Different substrate, different support, different poison and a different stop point; the only thing in common is deliberately crippling Pd so that it halts one step early.